British Empire TheoryThis is a featured page

British Empire Theory

The biggest empire in world history centered on London, England, but fell apart as the British became uninterested in imperialism and sought an allegedly more equitable system called the Commonwealth of Nations. However, what's to say conservatives in the halls of Parliament don't want a rebirth of the "empire on which the sun never sets"? Britain could get away with it, too: Who would ever suspect an ally of the United States? The ultimate revenge for peonage in the American Revolution...


No user avatar
emodHst
Latest page update: made by emodHst , May 26 2007, 9:23 AM EDT (about this update About This Update emodHst vandalism, which was fixed by user IceCub - emodHst

No content added or deleted.

- complete history)
More Info: links to this page
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
molfluon T'other way round 3 Mar 19 2008, 12:27 AM EDT by dcborn
Thread started: Feb 16 2008, 4:44 PM EST  Watch
Many of us brits would prefer integration into a worldwide anglo-saxon state instead of the EU. Especially if the Candadians, Aussies and Kiwis were up for it too. Not America to become a part of a new British Empire but precisely the opposite. Given population sizes by default such a democratically run republic would be lead by the citizens of the former U.S.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Show Last Reply
dcborn The Sun Set on the British Empire Not for Lack of Interest 0 Mar 19 2008, 12:17 AM EDT by dcborn
Thread started: Mar 19 2008, 12:17 AM EDT  Watch
One of the symptoms of the fall of the British Empire was their inability to hang onto India. Why? I suppose it had something to do with a little war which took a wide swath of Asia and put it under the control of the Imperial forces of the Empire of Japan. Kind of hard to hang on the Burma, Singapore, etc. And the Indians were playing games with their rice exports -- I think they made sure they went to Japan. So how do you hang on to an empire when the subjects are making common cause with your enemy? India broke away as a direct result of the war, in the late 1940's. By that time, British people in the Mother Country were still on rations, and were into the 1950's. It's very simple: Britain did not lose her empire because of lack of interest, but because of lack of principal -- money that is.
Do you find this valuable?    
sonofnun UKingdom 0 Sep 1 2007, 1:43 PM EDT by sonofnun
Thread started: Sep 1 2007, 1:43 PM EDT  Watch
Sure would explain why we haven't seen them (or Canada) helping out. Tony Blair....super ticked because Bush dragged him into Iraq and ruined his political career takes the helm?
2  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None
Showing 3 of 4 threads for this page - view all

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)