Sign in or 

Downunder |
Latest page update: made by Downunder
, Mar 26 2008, 6:43 AM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by Downunder
view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
We know enough about Jericho
What about everybody else
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonymous | 20 kiloton nukes (page: 1 2 3 4) | 77 | Apr 6 2011, 10:33 AM EDT by DuncanONeil | ||
|
|
Thread started: Feb 11 2007, 2:00 AM EST
Watch
20 kilotons seems pretty small for a nuclear device. Does anybody know how much damage they could have done? Maybe a few city blocks?
|
||||
| Pacal | Why small capitals? | 5 | Feb 23 2011, 9:11 PM EST by Sandbagger | ||
|
Thread started: Oct 30 2007, 11:16 PM EDT
Watch
France had Versailles during the monarchy, Spain had Toledo, and The U.S. had DC. That became bigger exponentially after all. its safer to administrate from a small city since less people means better control of ho enters, and presents more space for future expansion or building of infrastructures, being big cities like new York, too crowded, inn stable, and impossible of further development during hard situations, Albany meanwhile is a small city whit much space, many parks, and have already a state government established. Big cities also presents big problems, Epidemics, sanitary problems, Transportation problems, problems that head of state can’t worry about, being to busy whit the rest of the country. Also, big cities are BIG targets for further attacks. Me being president, would rule from Jericho after all, is safer, and more Mann able. and by the way, fallout is carried in the clouds and falls clean whit rain, contaminating land and water sources, while rivers would transport some of that radiation, it would not remain long contaminated, also salt water serve as a good radiation wash, or something like that I read some time ago, the radiation that should be feared the most is the one remained in ground cero of the nuke, that will remain for many years
|
|||||
| Anonymous | Montana? | 4 | Feb 23 2011, 9:05 PM EST by Sandbagger | ||
|
|
Thread started: Feb 6 2007, 2:08 AM EST
Watch
It's surprising--if not downright odd-- that no points in Montana were hit. Montana holds many natural resources (lumber, mineral, oil, gas), agricurtural resources, and is also home to many still-active missile silos commanded from Malmstrom AFB outside of Great Falls. If this is a domestic attack or coup, perhaps it is Montana's strategic nature which explains why it hasn't been hit. In other words, could the attack have come FROM Montana?
|
||||