Sign in or 

|
my2bad |
Latest page update: made by my2bad
, Jun 18 2007, 11:59 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
3 words added 3 words deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
CBS
Jericho
nuclear attack
plot theories
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonymous | Nope Nope Nope | 2 | Aug 8 2007, 8:43 AM EDT by jph37 | ||
|
|
Thread started: Jan 24 2007, 6:28 PM EST
Watch
New York- they caught guys with a truck and a nuclear weapon.
There was no "dropping" of nuclear bombs. They were merely brought into cities and detonated. Surely, the blackbox taken from the commercial jetliner would have recorded chatter of observed missiles, contrails, etc. These planes went up before the bombs went off, so they would have witnessed some aerial activity if it was a missile-based attack. Question: Why would Hawkins be in on the disaster ahead? It is suggested that he has some sort of government affiliation, although this may not be the case, as he had foreknowledge of the events which were soon to occur. I believe that the attacks were an inside job. Some well-connected persons who were exploiting and manipulating things to fulfill an unknown agenda. I believe these persons had connections in either the military or intelligence communities as they would have considerable autonomy. If a terrorist activity were to be going on without the complicity of these groups, the President would not have been in the House of Representatives giving a speech when the nukes went off. He would have been deep underground long before then. The Minuteman missiles being launched? Possibly for a counterattack internal to the US, against some protected compounds or some such. Or just for the EMP to render potential threats to the conspirators incapacitated. My theory- a corporate conglomerate of Halliburton/Blackwater/Bechtel hoping to either control the government or to engage in profiteering while rebuilding the devastated country, making federal money off the misery of others. |
||||
| swamp | Economics and Warfare | 2 | May 2 2007, 8:12 PM EDT by Anonymous | ||
|
Thread started: Feb 6 2007, 12:09 AM EST
Watch
The dirty little secret to all this is that all wars are economic in nature. It has been pointed out quite clearly that this attack was likely an attempt to cripple the US and other nations by destroying finanacial or trade centers. The WTC was attacked on 9/11 because it was an economic and political target according to Bin Laden and his deputies. They sought to cripple Western economies and force US withdrawal from Islamic lands. You have to note that Bin Laden is a believer in the historical version of Islam from about the 9th century. At that time much of present day Europe was Islamic lands.
As I stated earlier wars always have an economic component. Hitler wanted to conquer Europe and establish a German 1,000 year Reich to wield both military and economic power. You can't successfully have one without the other. Guns, bombs, and missles cost money. The Roman empire was as much an economic enterprise as a military one. It has also been pointed out that both China and Russia would be unlikely to see any real economic benefit from attacking the US in this manner. It would not be in their best interests today. At the time of this attack, maybe things have changed. My vote is that the conflict was initiated by those that thought they would benefit from it. That means North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Libya, and world terror organizations like Hamas. Pakistan and India are also potential sources of materials or conspirators. The plotters have to see this as gaining them something while risking them little, otherwise why do it? I'd say Venezuela, Iran, with technical help from terror groups and Pakistani nuclear scientists. The goal cripple the US and set the stage for Venezuelan communist domination of South and Central America and to allow Iran to grow unimpeded into an Islamic superpower controlling much of the world's oil and gas reserves. The next step for Iran would be the destruction of Israel while the EU writes a strong letter of protest. |
|||||
| Anonymous | how done it | 0 | Apr 17 2007, 7:29 PM EDT by Anonymous | ||
|
|
Thread started: Apr 17 2007, 7:29 PM EDT
Watch
it could have been americans as shown in episode 18 a.k.a.
|
||||