Sign in or 
Location: Plot Theories
Discussion: Where is the UN ?
Category:
Discussion Forum /
General Discussion
Share this
DuncanONeil |
20. RE: Where is the UN ?
Feb 21 2008, 9:14 AM EST
"Like what we are doing in Korea . Keeping two sides from killing each other." Besides that war is not yet over!
2
out of
4 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
DuncanONeil |
21. RE: Where is the UN ?
Feb 21 2008, 9:15 AM EST
"Not to mention the nukes on the Navy ships and subs. That is if they are still loyal to to the US. (considering San Deigo and Seattle were nuked all the other major naval bases in the US are on the East coast with the exception of Hawaii and Alaska.)"What makes you think the bases in Seattle and San Diego were hurt? 2 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you? |
RangerTess |
22. RE: Where is the UN ?
Feb 21 2008, 1:46 PM EST
"With the UN historical anti American leanings I find it very difficult to even consider what you say. Add to that the fact that this got put together in such a short time! The river may be wide but with the number of boats available no way the river is secure.I do not think the U.N. is using boats, I think the U.N. has forces lined up on the borders of the River. When I said a Billion dead I was counting the deaths from NK and Iran. Not to mention the deaths that will be caused from the Hudson Valley Virus. The U.N. will def join the USA if the inside plot is found out and the ASA Government is the cause for millions of deaths. Needless to say, it has not been a short time. It has been a few months since the attacks. We are talking about U.N. the resources are endless. You have England, France, Germany, China, Japan, Canada..and so forth. They could act within the first week. Semper Fi -Ranger Tess 4 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
DuncanONeil |
23. RE: Where is the UN ?
Feb 22 2008, 9:09 AM EST
"I do not think the U.N. is using boats, I think the U.N. has forces lined up on the borders of the River. When I said a Billion dead I was counting the deaths from NK and Iran. Not to mention the deaths that will be caused from the Hudson Valley Virus. The U.N. will def join the USA if the inside plot is found out and the ASA Government is the cause for millions of deaths. Needless to say, it has not been a short time. It has been a few months since the attacks. We are talking about U.N. the resources are endless. You have England, France, Germany, China, Japan, Canada..and so forth. They could act within the first week.Didn't think the UN was using boats, the people are. With the US in turmoil the UN is effectively out of business. Those "endless resources" you speak of come from the US. The show told us 15 million dead. One billion is three times our current population. By definition the UN can not join any country. 1 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
RangerTess |
24. RE: Where is the UN ?
Feb 22 2008, 12:03 PM EST
One Billion-If we count the deaths from Iran and North Korea and the after-effects (Hudson Valley Virus)
3
out of
5 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
DuncanONeil |
25. RE: Where is the UN ?
Feb 23 2008, 9:56 AM EST
"One Billion-If we count the deaths from Iran and North Korea and the after-effects (Hudson Valley Virus) "Your casualty count is more than two and one-half times the total population of all three countries combined! If you want such a huge number you could at least TRY to be realistic. 3 out of 5 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Dhrun |
26. RE: Where is the UN ?
Feb 23 2008, 6:12 PM EST
There is no evidence that the ASA has ALL the nukes. They certainly have many of the ICBM silos, but the US arsenal has a variety of nukes:1. Bomber bases in the east (although there are less SAC nukes than during the Cold War) 2. The ASA doesn't necessarily control the US Navy, which has plenty of nukes. 3. Nukes stationed overseas. 4. Britain and France, both NATO allies, have nukes. I assume they currently support the US rather than the ASA. The ASA has no nuclear monopoly, although they are certainly a helluva lot mroe willing to use theirs! 3 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Dhrun |
27. RE: Where is the UN ?
Feb 23 2008, 6:13 PM EST
Nice perspective - I suppose Iran and North Korea getting annihilated doesn't count in a casualty total?
2
out of
4 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
DuncanONeil |
28. RE: Where is the UN ?
Feb 23 2008, 9:07 PM EST
"Nice perspective - I suppose Iran and North Korea getting annihilated doesn't count in a casualty total?"To whom are you speaking here? 0 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
mjk1971 |
29. RE: Where is the UN ?
Feb 28 2008, 4:02 AM EST
Who cares! They can go to Hell. The US is the biggest funder of the UN, and they probably dried up when the money chute was cut off.
2
out of
5 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
mjk1971 |
30. RE: Where is the UN ?
Feb 28 2008, 4:07 AM EST
"There is no evidence that the ASA has ALL the nukes. They certainly have many of the ICBM silos, but the US arsenal has a variety of nukes:Kings Bay, the Atlantic Fleet's base for Ohio SSBNs, is in the USA (Georgia). One Ohio could make quick work of the Asinine States of America. There are no more bomber bases in what is now left of the USA. However, presumably, some of the Air Combat Command bases for fighters/fighter-bombers would have tactical warheads available. The only bomber bases are in LA, MO, and ND, all in the so-called "ASA." Not including what might have been at Diego Garcia or Andersen AFB, Guam. 1 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
Ciaróg |
31. RE: Where is the UN ?
Feb 28 2008, 11:15 AM EST
"Kings Bay, the Atlantic Fleet's base for Ohio SSBNs, is in the USA (Georgia). One Ohio could make quick work of the Asinine States of America.Charleston Naval Weapon Station has a few nuclear dumb bombs I think. 3 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
dichay |
32. RE: Where is the UN ?
Feb 28 2008, 3:14 PM EST
As long as they stay out I don’t care! U.N. would only screw things up
1
out of
3 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
WeTheSheeple |
33. RE: Where is the UN ?
Mar 1 2008, 5:15 PM EST
"Just where is the UN in all of this ?"RIght Behind the Attacks : ) Google - "EndGame" 1 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
jstarpl |
34. RE: Where is the UN ?
Mar 19 2008, 5:14 PM EDT
I find it strange why so many americans believe that everybody hates them - we just don't like your methods or behaviour, but that's it. If you do the math, you'll find out, that though USA is the largest single sponsor of the UN (it provides 22% of it's annual budget), the rest of the countries, that would certainly be sympathetic to such a terrible tragedy (Japan and the entire European Union) provide more than 50% of it's funding. I think, that in real life, all resources available to these countries would be at USA's disposal within 24 hours, with a deployment window of 48 hours. And I am more than certian, that these countries would go to any lengths to put people responsible for such genocide before a UN tribunal. And I am more than certain that their loyality would lay with the USA and not the ASA, as the USA is the legal continuation of the original United States. And every possible effort would be made to ensure that the power wouldn't be taken over by an undemocraticly chosen government. Why? If not because we're (europeans I mean) pretty decent people, than because it's in our financial intrest - stable United States mean a stable world economy.
2
out of
3 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
BecksGram |
35. RE: Where is the UN ?
Mar 19 2008, 5:27 PM EDT
""Just where is the UN in all of this ?"I disagree with you there. I see no similarities between the two. 3 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
DuncanONeil |
36. RE: Where is the UN ?
Mar 19 2008, 11:40 PM EDT
""Just where is the UN in all of this ?"Interesting thought! But how could the united squablers have ever got together long enough? 0 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
DuncanONeil |
37. RE: Where is the UN ?
Mar 19 2008, 11:52 PM EDT
You apparently have missed how the UN is in the same camp with the rabid liberals in regards to anti American leanings!
0
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
jstarpl |
38. RE: Where is the UN ?
Mar 21 2008, 5:52 AM EDT
anti-American leanings? Don't be absurd. In Poland, where I live, there is also a president, that is most controversial, and those who support him call everyone else 'traitors' and 'anti-Polish'. Just because some of those countries (I say some, since under Nicolas Sarkozy it's hard to call France anything else than pro-american) disagree on several topics with the current US administration doesn't mean that they are anti-american. It simply means they have a diffrent opinion. If you call everyone with a diffrent opinion - an enemy, it's hard to find friends.
2
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
DuncanONeil |
39. RE: Where is the UN ?
Mar 21 2008, 7:50 AM EDT
You message speaks to specifics. Sure there are people that think as you report. I was not speaking of countries, only the UN. However in general if you look at things the UN, as a body, has done there is a significant anti-American bias within that body.The next has more reference to the immigration issue but is related. Some in this country are absolutely convinced that the entire rest of the world hates us and we must do "something" to change that. My general response to that is "if that is the case, why do so many people want to come here?" Do you find this valuable? |
