Location: Russia

Discussion: WarReported This is a featured thread

Showing 1 - 12 of 12  |  Show  posts at a time

Posted Anonymously
War
Dec 9 2006, 11:15 AM EST | Post edited: Dec 9 2006, 11:15 AM EST
First, China and England don't have the capability of delivering multiple nuclear warheads to the U.S. Second China does not need our food. Third the breakup of the Soviet Union left quite a few nukes in the Ukraine. The Ukraine and Russia are the only ones with the ability to hit us like that. The Ukraine is hard to imagine. Russia has slid into a fascist state in recent year. My vote is strongly Russia. My distant second is one I haven't heard from anyone else, Extraterrestials. 4  out of 16 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None

Posted Anonymously
1. RE: War
Dec 10 2006, 11:45 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 10 2006, 11:45 PM EST
All of the Ukrainian nukes were disarmed and returned to Russia about ten years ago. Ukraine is one of the few nuclear countries that entirely disarmed voluntarily and publicly. 4  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    

Posted Anonymously
2. RE: War
Dec 13 2006, 12:10 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 13 2006, 12:10 PM EST
Extraterrestrials wouldn't use 20kt nuclear weapons, they would use the technology that got them TRILLIONS OF MILES THROUGH FUCKING SPACE 4  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
JudyConklin
JudyConklin
3. RE: War
Dec 14 2006, 4:16 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 14 2006, 4:16 PM EST
England has NO REASON to go to war with us. The U.K.--England, Scotland, Wales, Australia, NX, and our contiguous neighbor, Canada--have no motive to mess with us. They've always been our staunchest allies. Don't know if Russia would hit us. The problem is that their bureacrats are all crookeder than Mexican politicos. Betcha the nukes CAME FROM Russia but were sold off to whever hit us. 3  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
JudyConklin
JudyConklin
4. RE: War
Dec 14 2006, 4:19 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 14 2006, 4:19 PM EST
"Extraterrestrials wouldn't use 20kt nuclear weapons, they would use the technology that got them TRILLIONS OF MILES THROUGH FUCKING SPACE"
PLUS they would have a delivery system. These suckers were smuggled in or built here and set off at ground level, bespeaking no missiles/bombers. That's why the damned EMP is such a puzzlement. THAT came on a missile. One really smart person on another thread suggested that WE set off the EMP to kill the triggers on any bombs still floating around. But those WERE anti-missile missiles, weren't they? Let's face it, crew. We are never gonna figure this out. Just like Jericho, this Wiki is addictive!
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    

Posted Anonymously
5. RE: War
Dec 16 2006, 9:43 AM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2006, 9:43 AM EST
Not true, China has about 50 ICBMs capable of reaching the US. Britan has 4 SSBNs capable of launching 16 SLBMs each, 3 warheads apiece. France has 5 SSBNs with the same number of SLBMs and warheads. More than enough firepower to devistate the US. 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    

Posted Anonymously
6. RE: War
Dec 17 2006, 12:09 AM EST | Post edited: Dec 17 2006, 12:09 AM EST
I dont know where you got your information from. But you are sorely wrong. Both China and England have Submarine launched ballistic missiles. England in the form of U.S. designed and built Trident II D5 Balistic missiles on 4 Vangaurd Class submarines, each with 16 missiles and China though small has one Xia class submarine with 12 missiles. Each of these subs carry multiple missiles with multiple war heads. Not to mention the french have four ballistic missile subs. 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Posted Anonymously
7. RE: War
Dec 21 2006, 9:32 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 21 2006, 9:32 PM EST
No one has mention bomber aircraft which is part of the trident. 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    

Posted Anonymously
8. RE: War
Dec 29 2006, 7:32 AM EST | Post edited: Dec 29 2006, 7:32 AM EST
Russia's gov't falls apart. Nukes smuggled out fall into hands of Iran and North Korea. Iran somehow gets a hold of Russian nuclear Submarines and launches missiles from the Gulf of Mexico with
blessing of their ally 'Venezuela" and North Korea attacks from the
West coast using their own diesel subs
Or it could be that terrorist launched Russia's missiles, when the
Gov't was over thrown.
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    

Posted Anonymously
9. RE: War
Feb 24 2007, 7:17 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 24 2007, 7:17 PM EST
whos to say it was a forein power this could have been done by people wanting to see our goverment changed. if they wanted to take out millitary bases or cripple our money there are better targets than cleveland or cincinati in that erea in dayton you have WRIGHT PATTERSON airforce base which is alarge base and dont forget that they were supost have taken extraterestials there for experiments long ago and then to the south you have FORT KNOX if you wanted to take out our money why not start with NATIONAL GOLD RESERVE and one of our largest armoured vehical training centers we know it was not hit the MYSTERY WOMAN said there was a refugge camp in lexington and that the KY. NATIONAL GUARD was in place 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
JudyConklin
JudyConklin
10. RE: War
Feb 25 2007, 10:46 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 25 2007, 10:46 AM EST
"First, China and England don't have the capability of delivering multiple nuclear warheads to the U.S. Second China does not need our food. Third the breakup of the Soviet Union left quite a few nukes in the Ukraine. The Ukraine and Russia are the only ones with the ability to hit us like that. The Ukraine is hard to imagine. Russia has slid into a fascist state in recent year. My vote is strongly Russia. My distant second is one I haven't heard from anyone else, Extraterrestials."
England wouldn't WANT to as since the Revolutionary War, they've been our staunchest allies. They are small but tough and brave and truly need us to jump in and protect THEM, if necessary. They aren't fair weather friends like the French. China is making megaprofits in manufacturing by absorbing our outsourced jobs from firms like Nike. However, ideology sometimes demands sacrifice. Just like al Qaeda has an ideology which demands burying first Jews and then Christians and considers us the Great Shatan, China has a Communist ideology and might be willing to be poorer to wipe this phat capitalist nation off the face of the earth. But the problem with the old Russian Communism was its corruption--bureacrats were as crooked and on the take as Mexican politicians and police. The Chinese bureacrat living in comfort at the expense of the poor making 35-50 cents an hour at the Nike factory--the political movers and shakers--would probably not WANT to destroy the biggest market for their manufactured goods.
Do you find this valuable?    

Posted Anonymously
11. RE: War
May 1 2007, 6:22 PM EDT | Post edited: May 1 2007, 6:22 PM EDT
Hey, I'm from Moscow and there is no fascists. NO_FACISTS :) Talks about 'evil Russian regime' is just propaganda to keep people focused on The Enemy, not on own state's problems.
0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?