Welcome! This is a website that everyone can build together. It's easy!

Location: Ravenwood

Discussion: Ravenwood

Keyword tags: None

Watch

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)



Anonymous
Ravenwood
Feb 22 2007, 5:40 PM EST
Ravenwood is behind the attacks. This faction got into the government hiearchies when hired for secruity in Afghanistan and iraq. They could have eliminated any threat. Ravenwood wasnt the only ones involved. They were used by a HOMEGROWN terrorist group. As we know now, ravenwood transported weapons to the insurgents fighting our miltary overseas. Ravenwood did this in exchange for access for nuclear weapons. Ravenwood was paid by this homegrown group for there services. Ravenwood then gave these groups the bombs because ravenwood was high in the government now. This homegrown group represents the growing "divide" in the nation. This was a plan to fracture the country. Its so obvious now. Jake Green killed some people in Iraq because these people were getting in the way of Ravenwood's plan. He didnt know this at the time. Hawkins got into the group as an FBI mole. Im not too sure, but either it was him or his "mystery women" in washignton that was the mole, and the other was in the terrorist group. I rock 12  out of 19 found this valuable. Do you?    
PDOGBOB

PDOGBOB
RE: Ravenwood
Feb 26 2007, 10:53 PM EST
KUDOS TO YOU. THIS IS THE CLOSEST ANSWER TO THE REAL TRUTH ON THE PLOT THEORY TO DATE. THERE IS A LOT THAT WE STILL DON'T KNOW BUT WE NOW KNOW ALL THE OTHER BIZARRE AND PLAUSIBLE THEORIES ARE JUST NOT GOING TO PROVE OUT. THANK GOODNESS FOR THE 2/21 EPISODE- I WAS JUST BEGINNING TO BELIEVE IN THE ALIEN THEORY. Do you find this valuable?    

Anonymous
Ravenwood
Mar 20 2007, 4:55 AM EDT
Are some of the people that work for PMC's nut jobs??? Yep there are. Just as nuts get jobs in other professions. In the military I was told once by an Officer that no matter how hard the screening process is. 90% will be hard working decent people. But 10% of the nuts will slip past you. So I take a lot of offense to the show portraying PMC's as evil bad guys. Or as mindless trigger pullers following orders. Do you find this valuable?    

Anonymous
Ravenwood
Mar 20 2007, 5:01 AM EDT
ooohh wanted to add another thing. I can't remember the university but in the early 1990's. One obtained a grant from the US governement to study how the military and civilian police could enforce a ban on private ownership of firearms. Its weird because in the study they found that over 80% of the military officer corp said they would resign before enforcing such a law. Yet over 70% of the the US civilian Chief's of Police said they would enforce it but would need the militaries assistance. The study had the specific percentages. I just can't remember the specific number but remember the military was in the 80% and the civilian Chief's of Police across the country were in the 70%. Do you find this valuable?    
lonebiker1
lonebiker1
RE: Ravenwood
Apr 14 2007, 10:36 PM EDT
I'm not sure what PMC is supposed to mean but if you're referring to people like Blackwater they're all a bunch of whacked out mercenary killers. Take a look at the video that was all over the net of "contractors" driving down a street in Baghdad firing automatic weapons at people in cars and laughing about it. Murderers not accountable to anyone. Do you find this valuable?    

Anonymous
RE: Ravenwood
May 4 2007, 11:57 AM EDT
"Are some of the people that work for PMC's nut jobs??? Yep there are. Just as nuts get jobs in other professions. In the military I was told once by an Officer that no matter how hard the screening process is. 90% will be hard working decent people. But 10% of the nuts will slip past you. So I take a lot of offense to the show portraying PMC's as evil bad guys. Or as mindless trigger pullers following orders. "
The group that is in the show is one unit not the whole company so that one Ravenwood unit [bold]COULD[/bold] in theory be made of complete nut jobs with out the whole Privet Military Company (PMC) being bad.
Do you find this valuable?