Already a member?
Sign in
Location: Characters of Jericho
Discussion: roger
Keyword tags:
None
Watch
|
Anonymous |
roger
Apr 26 2007, 7:39 PM EDT what ever happened to roger? jake told him to take the road to new bern, but since things with new bern aren't turning out so nice... 14 out of 15 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
phoenixriz phoenixriz |
RE: roger
Jul 29 2007, 12:44 AM EDT If Roger went to New Bern maybe he hijacked the train and is headed for Jericho. 1 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
leafyc2i2 |
RE: roger
Aug 4 2007, 4:50 PM EDT I have often wondered about that myself. I thought that it was kind of odd that if Emily was so in love with Roger and was so glad to have him alive after all. Why didn't she put up too much of a fight when he told her that he wanted her to stay in Jericho? And why hasn't she said a single word about him since he left? 3 out of 5 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
MichalNancyKarni |
RE: roger: letting him go
Aug 4 2007, 11:51 PM EDT "I have often wondered about that myself. I thought that it was kind of odd that if Emily was so in love with Roger and was so glad to have him alive after all. Why didn't she put up too much of a fight when he told her that he wanted her to stay in Jericho? And why hasn't she said a single word about him since he left? "considering the situation outside of Jericho it almost a death sentence to banish someone from the town. It makes a lot of sense that she doesn't fight to go with him. They don't have a very good chance of surviving. He has almost no food, and no shelter. There isn't anything to hunt or scavange on the road. Roger has reasonable odds if he can get to a community that will take him in, but considering that Jericho just tried to throw out the refugees, that doesn't seem very likely that he'll find some place within walking distance that can do that. In episode 14 you could see that thousands of people were are the move to get to a warmer climate. I doubt if he hijacked the train. That is either Russell or the US army or New Bern reenforcments for Constantino. 5 out of 5 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
leafyc2i2 |
RE: roger: letting him go
Aug 5 2007, 4:48 PM EDT I think you have a very good point. In all you've stated. But I will be very angry, yet not surprised, if Emily never mentions him again. I mean come on! this was the man she was going to marry and spend the rest of her life with! How is it possible that she can seemingly get over him so quickly and compleatly? It makes me question what kind of person Emily is. I've never been a huge fan of her myself. Yes I'm on "team Heather" lol. But in light of this development Im liking Emily even less. 2 out of 5 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Melissa21 Melissa21 |
RE: roger: letting him go
Aug 16 2007, 12:31 PM EDT "I think you have a very good point. In all you've stated. But I will be very angry, yet not surprised, if Emily never mentions him again. I mean come on! this was the man she was going to marry and spend the rest of her life with! How is it possible that she can seemingly get over him so quickly and compleatly? It makes me question what kind of person Emily is.Did you ever stop to think that maybe she could let Roger go so easily (or not--she was crying when he walked out of town) was because she has always loved Jake and will always be in love with Jake? 6 out of 7 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
leafyc2i2 |
RE: roger: letting him go
Aug 18 2007, 8:18 PM EDT "Did you ever stop to think that maybe she could let Roger go so easily (or not--she was crying when he walked out of town) was because she has always loved Jake and will always be in love with Jake?"I guess that maybe that's what I was getting at. But still its not fair to any of them involved. I'm willing to give her the benifit of the doubt and say that perhaps she didn't even realize that she never loved Roger the way that she loved Jake. The way that you are, in my opinion, supposed to love the person you intend to spend the rest of you're life with. Maybe I'm just making too much of a big deal out of nothing. 3 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
foxgray1 foxgray1 |
RE: roger: letting him go
Aug 19 2007, 2:57 PM EDT I believe the reason Emily didn't marry Jake in the first place was because she blamed him for her brother's death. If she ever forgives Jakes, I think they will get together, and in the back of her mind, that was why she wasn't really upset that much when Roger left 3 out of 5 found this valuable. Do you? |
